Language

Tuesday, October 62 papers

arXiv

Saying, Not Knowing: Aggressively GGUF-Quantized Small Language Models Still Write Rare Words They Can No Longer Define

Saurabh Kumar Singh, Yogeshwar Singh Dadwhal, Malhar Vedak

Post-training quantization to the GGUF format's mixed-precision K-quants is commonly how open-weight language models reach consumer hardware, yet its effect on…Post-training quantization to the GGUF format's mixed-precision K-quants is commonly how open-weight language models reach consumer hardware, yet its effect on fine-grained lexical competence is uncharacterized.

Preprint: empirical study

Monday, October 56 papers

arXiv

Language Models that Play Chess and Explain Their Moves

Adithya Bhaskar, Jeffrey Cheng, Danqi Chen

Modern chess engines are silent experts: they play at a superhuman level, but do not offer explanations for their play.Modern chess engines are silent experts: they play at a superhuman level, but do not offer explanations for their play. On the other hand, language models (LMs) can generate plausible-sounding explanations, but their weak playing…

Preprint: new model
arXiv

OLMo-Detect: A Multi-Stage, Confounder-Controlled Benchmark for Membership Inference on Large Language Models

Tao Shi, Chaoyi Xiang, Qiongkai Xu et al.

Membership inference on large language models (LLMs) aims to determine whether a given text sample was included in an LLM's training data, without access to its training…Membership inference on large language models (LLMs) aims to determine whether a given text sample was included in an LLM's training data, without access to its training corpus.

Preprint: benchmark or dataset
arXiv

Misinformation Without Triggers: From Factual Answers to Downstream Decisions

Lin Tian, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu

Language models learn from web documents, some of them false, and false content can reach a model's answer to a factual question and the summaries and decisions that use…Language models learn from web documents, some of them false, and false content can reach a model's answer to a factual question and the summaries and decisions that use it.

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Counterexample Generation via Per-Theorem Symbolic Verifiers: When Imitation Hurts and Reinforcement Repairs

Omar Farouk Zouak, Houssam Eddine Boukhalfa, Soumaya Lakehal et al.

Large language models often solve a theorem forward yet fail to disprove a closely related false one: a falsification gap that supervised fine-tuning does not close and…Large language models often solve a theorem forward yet fail to disprove a closely related false one: a falsification gap that supervised fine-tuning does not close and can actively worsen.

Preprint: benchmark or dataset
arXiv

Framing the Narrative: Ideological Mimicry in Large Language Models

Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Michael Jacobs, Nils Metternich et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to answer questions about politically contentious issues, yet evaluations typically treat a model's stance as a…Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to answer questions about politically contentious issues, yet evaluations typically treat a model's stance as a relatively stable property.

Preprint: benchmark or dataset

Friday, October 210 papers

arXiv

KaliBench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Cybersecurity Tool Use on Kali Linux with Runtime-Free Verifiable Rewards

Pengfei Li, Naufal Suryanto, Sicheng Zhang et al.

LLMs are increasingly applied to cybersecurity workflows, where they are expected to translate analysts' intent into tool invocations.LLMs are increasingly applied to cybersecurity workflows, where they are expected to translate analysts' intent into tool invocations. However, existing evaluations focus on knowledge-based assessments or end-to-end agentic tasks…

Preprint: benchmark or dataset
arXiv

Argo-Bench: Evaluating Data Agents on Enterprise-Scale Workflows

Gabriel Tomitsuka, Arman Raayatsanati, Emma Xing et al.

Real-world enterprise data science and analytics workflows require reasoning across dozens of tables, performing statistical analyses, and acting on the results.Real-world enterprise data science and analytics workflows require reasoning across dozens of tables, performing statistical analyses, and acting on the results.

Preprint: benchmark or dataset
arXiv

Know When to Hold 'em: Correct-Token Retention in Uniform-State Diffusion Language Models

Mojtaba Nafez, James Henderson

Uniform-state diffusion models (USDMs) can revise any token at any denoising step, which lets them correct their own mistakes, a key advantage over masked diffusion.Uniform-state diffusion models (USDMs) can revise any token at any denoising step, which lets them correct their own mistakes, a key advantage over masked diffusion.

Preprint: method
arXiv

The Devil Is in the Reconstruction Loss Scale: Rethinking Optimization in LLM Quantization

Chao Li, Shigeng Wang, Anbang Yao

Post-training quantization (PTQ) methods typically use sequential quantization that partitions a pre-trained LLM into a series of units (e.g., transformer blocks), with…Post-training quantization (PTQ) methods typically use sequential quantization that partitions a pre-trained LLM into a series of units (e.g., transformer blocks), with one unit quantized at each stage.

Preprint: method
arXiv

How Divergence Becomes Decision Flips in Compressed Language Models

Beatriz Almeida Felicio

Compression reports summarize how far a compressed language model moved from the dense one, usually by a KL divergence; a deployment that relies on the dense model's…Compression reports summarize how far a compressed language model moved from the dense one, usually by a KL divergence; a deployment that relies on the dense model's outputs needs to know how many of its decisions changed.

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Closing the Loop: Practical Training Recipes for Looped Language Models

Andrei Marchenko, Viacheslav Bezrukov, Oleg Kashurin et al.

Looped language models increase effective depth by repeatedly applying a shared block of layers, but existing large-scale recipes require multi-stage training over…Looped language models increase effective depth by repeatedly applying a shared block of layers, but existing large-scale recipes require multi-stage training over trillions of tokens, while the benefits of recurrence remain…

Preprint: new model
arXiv

Emergent Unfaithfulness: How Alignment Training Causes Language Models to Silently Override Task Faithfulness

Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Janvijay Singh, Gokhan Tur et al.

Large language models are characterized by three key properties: capability, alignment, and faithfulness.Large language models are characterized by three key properties: capability, alignment, and faithfulness. Prior work studies the tradeoffs between capability and alignment, and between capability and faithfulness, but a third…

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Assessing the Impact of Language Disparity on Multilingual Linguistic Ability in Large Language Models

Zhanyu Chen, Jaap Jumelet

Claims about the grammatical competence of multilingual language models vary sharply with how competence is measured, yet the interaction between evaluation paradigm…Claims about the grammatical competence of multilingual language models vary sharply with how competence is measured, yet the interaction between evaluation paradigm, post-training, and language resource availability has not been…

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Refusal Localizes, the Damage Relocates: Safety Layers Under Few-Sample Fine-Tuning

Jungseob Lee, Dongyub Jude Lee, Sugyeong Eo et al.

Fine-tuning adapts aligned large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but a few dozen harmful examples can remove their refusal of harmful requests.Fine-tuning adapts aligned large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but a few dozen harmful examples can remove their refusal of harmful requests.

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Pinned and Still Unstable: Within-Judge Verdict Variance and the Noise Floor of LLM-as-Judge Leaderboards

Krishna Chytanya Ayyagari

Modern LLM evaluation assumes that pinning a judge to a fixed model version and decoding at temperature zero yields reproducible verdicts.Modern LLM evaluation assumes that pinning a judge to a fixed model version and decoding at temperature zero yields reproducible verdicts. We show this assumption fails as a property of how LLM-as-Judge is operationalized on cloud…

Preprint: empirical study

Thursday, October 14 papers

arXiv

How Much Is an AI Token Worth? Scaling Laws for Wild AI-Generated Web Text

Jenna Russell, Ben Glickenhaus, Katherine Thai et al.

Web text makes up the majority of pretraining data and is increasingly AI-generated. After applying FineWeb quality filtering, we find that 27.5% of tokens from June 2026…Web text makes up the majority of pretraining data and is increasingly AI-generated. After applying FineWeb quality filtering, we find that 27.5% of tokens from June 2026 web data are labeled as AI-generated by Pangram, rising to…

Preprint: method
arXiv

Synthetic Pre-pretraining Survives Scale, but Not as a Grammatical Prior

Atsuki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Inaba, Joel Niklaus et al.

Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic non-natural language data improves token efficiency during language model pre-training (PT).Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic non-natural language data improves token efficiency during language model pre-training (PT). Prior work attributes this gain to a grammatical prior, i.e., a structural inductive bias learned…

Preprint: empirical study
arXiv

Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting

Haohan Yuan, Simin Chen, Xi Niu et al.

Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance.Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance.

Preprint: method
arXiv

The Backdrop Exposes What the World Around an Agent Costs It

Nusrat Jahan Lia, Shubhashis Roy Dipta

Agent benchmarks test agents in worlds that stay still. Deployed agents work in worlds that other people also change.Agent benchmarks test agents in worlds that stay still. Deployed agents work in worlds that other people also change. Someone texts the agent to send the money elsewhere or an order confirmation asks it to reply with a door code.

Preprint: benchmark or dataset