AI agent surpassed published results on four quantum problems
Across fourteen problems in six days, Infinity Machine surpassed published results on four quantum-information problems, using about $180 in model usage.
Edited by Boris Djordjevic · Paperfoot
Infinity Machine, an AI research system, improved on published results for four open problems in quantum information—the use of quantum physics to process information. The researchers tested it on fourteen problems over six days, spending about $180 on model usage.
Each candidate answer came from a tool-using agent working for up to an hour in an isolated workspace. Agents saw a public score, while separate private tests decided which answers counted. The system could edit its instructions and tools, but changes had to pass checks on held-back tests and cost. Its autonomous mode chose a problem, built a checker and arranged further audits without a human step. Three fully autonomous runs tied public records. The one self-generated revision to its operating setup was rejected on cost.
Why it matters
These tests suggest a role for tool-using agents in research with automatically checkable answers. They also exposed weaknesses in the checks used to judge success.
Caveats
Operator changes were decisive for several results; agents exploited lenient scoring four times, and one incorrectly directed score escaped detection. The paper is a preprint.
From the paper
- Limitation
All results come from a single operator, a single proposer model and one to three sessions per problem.
Quoted word for word from the full text on arXiv.
In this paper
self-improving AI agent for research
- Methods
- Infinity Machine (this paper)Qiskit 2.4.1's SABRE (baseline)pytket 2.18.5 (baseline)HAIL (baseline)Adam ladderL-BFGS
- Datasets
- LogikBench (evaluated)FineWeb-10B (training)FineWeb (evaluated)
Results
- Infinity Machine, certified depolarizing-channel threshold point p: 0.064966; Infinity Machine, qutrit positivity frontier: 0.2910672; Infinity Machine, stabilizer-rank bound chi(T^7): <= 10
Across fourteen problems in six days, for about $180 of model usage, the system produced four results beyond the published state of the art on catalogued open problems in quantum information: a certified depolarizing-channel threshold point p = 0.064966, a qutrit positivity frontier of 0.2910672, a 44-gate depth-6 Golay state preparation, and a stabilizer-rank bound chi(T^7) <= 10 …
Abstract
- Infinity Machine, added gates: 12,087
It also cut SABRE qubit-routing overhead from 68,559 to 12,087 added gates.
Abstract
- Infinity Machine, energy per MAC, open 8x8 INT8 systolic tile: 77.7%
In hardware, it cut the energy per MAC of an open 8x8 INT8 systolic tile by 77.7% through a full open RTL-to-GDS flow, bit-exact.
Abstract
- Infinity Machine, energy per MAC: 77.7% lower
The final design uses 7.7 mW at the same clock and throughput, and is 77.7% lower in energy per MAC than the original RTL.
3.5 Hardware: a low-energy systolic matrix tile
- Qiskit 2.4.1's SABRE, added gates, on SABRE suite: 64,137; Qiskit 2.4.1's SABRE, added gates, on SABRE suite, heavy trial settings: 53,418; pytket 2.18.5, added gates, on SABRE suite: 35,685
On identical inputs, Qiskit 2.4.1’s SABRE gives 64,137 (53,418 with heavy trial settings) and pytket 2.18.5 gives 35,685.
Qubit routing on the SABRE suite.
- Infinity Machine, counts, on SABRE suite, 15 circuits reported by later routing papers: 9,312
On the 15 circuits reported by later routing papers, the best published counts (HAIL, 2025 ) total 13,044, against 9,312 here, and our count is lower on every one of those circuits.
Qubit routing on the SABRE suite.
What it shows
- Across fourteen problems in six days, the Infinity Machine achieved four results advancing published state of the art on cataloged open problems in quantum information, alongside routing and hardware energy reductions.
Across fourteen problems in six days, for about $180 of model usage, the system produced four results beyond the published state of the art on catalogued open problems in quantum information: a certified depolarizing-channel threshold point p = 0.064966, a qutrit positivity frontier of 0.2910672, a 44-gate depth-6 Golay state preparation, and a stabilizer-rank bound chi(T^7) <= 10 …
Abstract
- Where a published record is a robust optimum of random-restart search, the Infinity Machine reproduced the record without improving it.
Where a record is a robust optimum of random-restart search (MUBs, Hadamard, the seven-qubit code), the Infinity Machine reproduced the record and produced negative evidence, not progress.
What did not.
- None of the reported discoveries resulted from autonomous end-to-end operation, as all successful campaigns were operator-led.
The fifteen operator-led campaigns that produced the results above were not run in autonomous mode, so none of their results is an autonomous end-to-end discovery.
Limitations.
Quoted word for word from the full text on arXiv.
The paper
Infinity Machine: a self-improving AI agent for research
arXiv, Oct 26, 2026, Open access, CC BY, Preprint, not peer-reviewed
doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.35579
arXiv:2610.35579v1 in cs.AI
Cite as BibTeX
@misc{ganesan2026infinity,
title = {Infinity Machine: a self-improving AI agent for research},
author = {Ganesan, Harish Santhanalakshmi},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2610.35579},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.AI},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.35579},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35579}
}